kyraneko:

fortheloveofplaid:

the most implausible thing about superhero movies is that these guys make their own suits, like seriously those toxic chemicals did NOT give you the ability to sew stretch knits, do you even own a serger

I feel like there’s this little secret place in the middle of some seedy New York business neighborhood, back room, doesn’t even have a sign on the door, but within three days of using their powers in public or starting a pattern of vigilanteism, every budding superhero or supervillain gets discreetly handed a scrap of paper with that address written on it.

Inside there’s this little tea table with three chairs, woodstove, minifridge, work table, sewing machines, bolts and bolts of stretch fabrics and maybe some kevlar, and two middle-aged women with matching wedding rings and sketchbooks.

And they invite you to sit down, and give you tea and cookies, and start making sketches of what you want your costume to look like, and you get measured, and told to come back in a week, and there’s your costume, waiting for you.

The first one is free. They tell you the price of subsequent ones, and it’s based on what you can afford. You have no idea how they found out about your financial situation. You try it on, and it fits perfectly, and you have no idea how they managed that without measuring you a whole lot more thoroughly than they did.

They ask you to pose for a picture with them. For their album, they say. The camera is old, big, the sort film camera artists hunt down at antique stores and pay thousands for, and they come pose on either side of you and one of them clicks the camera remotely by way of one of those squeeze-things on a cable that you’ve seen depicted from olden times. That one (the tall one, you think, though she isn’t really, thin and reminiscent of a Greek marble statue) pulls the glass plate from the camera and scurries off to the basement, while the other one (shorter, round, all smiles, her shiny black hair pulled up into a bun) brings out a photo album to show you their work.

Inside it is … everyone. Superheroes. Supervillains. Household names and people you don’t recognize. She flips through pages at random, telling you little bits about the guy in the purple spangly costume, the lady in red and black, the mysterious cloaked figure whose mask reveals one eye. As she pages back, the costumes start looking really convincingly retro, and her descriptions start having references to the Space Race, the Depression, the Great War.

The other lady comes up, holding your picture. You’re sort of surprised to find it’s in color, and then you realize all the others were, too, even the earliest ones. There you are, and you look like a superhero. You look down at yourself, and feel like a superhero. You stand up straighter, and the costume suddenly fits a tiny bit better, and they both smile proudly.

*

The next time you come in, it’s because the person who’s probably going to be your nemesis has shredded your costume. You bring the agreed-upon price, and you bake cupcakes to share with them. There’s a third woman there, and you don’t recognize her, but the way she moves is familiar somehow, and the air seems to sparkle around her, on the edge of frost or the edge of flame. She’s carrying a wrapped brown paper package in her arms, and she smiles at you and moves to depart. You offer her a cupcake for the road.

The two seamstresses go into transports of delight over the cupcakes. You drink tea, and eat cookies and a piece of a pie someone brought around yesterday. They examine your costume and suggest a layer of kevlar around the shoulders and torso, since you’re facing off with someone who uses claws.

They ask you how the costume has worked, contemplate small design changes, make sketches. They tell you a story about their second wedding that has you falling off the chair in tears, laughing so hard your stomach hurts. They were married in 1906, they say, twice. They took turns being the man. They joke about how two one-ring ceremonies make one two-ring ceremony, and figure that they each had one wedding because it only counted when they were the bride. 

They point you at three pictures on the wall. A short round man with an impressive beard grins next to a taller, white-gowned goddess; a thin man in top hat and tails looks adoringly down at a round and beaming bride; two women, in their wedding dresses, clasp each other close and smile dazzlingly at the camera. The other two pictures show the sanctuaries of different churches; this one was clearly taken in this room.

There’s a card next to what’s left of the pie. Elaborate silver curlicues on white, and it originally said “Happy 10th Anniversary,” only someone has taken a Sharpie and shoehorned in an extra 1, so it says “Happy 110th.” The tall one follows your gaze, tells you, morning wedding and evening wedding, same day. She picks up the card and sets it upright; you can see the name signed inside: Magneto.

You notice that scattered on their paperwork desk are many more envelopes and cards, and are glad you decided to bring the cupcakes.

*

When you pick up your costume the next time, it’s wrapped up in paper and string. You don’t need to try it on; there’s no way it won’t be perfect. You drink tea, eat candies like your grandmother used to make when you were small, talk about your nights out superheroing and your nemesis and your calculus homework and how today’s economy compares with the later years of the Depression.

When you leave, you meet a man in the alleyway. He’s big, and he radiates danger, but his eyes shift from you to the package in your arms, and he nods slightly and moves past you. You’re not the slightest bit surprised when he goes into the same door you came out of.

*

The next time you visit, there’s nothing wrong with your costume but you think it might be wise to have a spare. And also, you want to thank them for the kevlar. You bring artisan sodas, the kind you buy in glass bottles, and they give you stir fry, cooked on the wood-burning stove in a wok that looks a century old.

There’s no way they could possibly know that your day job cut your hours, but they give you a discount that suits you perfectly. Halfway through dinner, a cinderblock of a man comes in the door, and the shorter lady brings up an antique-looking bottle of liquor to pour into his tea. You catch a whiff and it makes your eyes water. The tall one sees your face, and grins, and says, Prohibition. 

You’re not sure whether the liquor is that old, or whether they’ve got a still down in the basement with their photography darkroom. Either seems completely plausible. The four of you have a rousing conversation about the merits of various beverages over dinner, and then you leave him to do business with the seamstresses.

*

It’s almost a year later, and you’re on your fifth costume, when you see the gangly teenager chase off a trio of would-be purse-snatchers with a grace of movement that can only be called superhuman.

You take pen and paper from one of your multitude of convenient hidden pockets, and scribble down an address. With your own power and the advantage of practice, it’s easy to catch up with her, and the work of an instant to slip the paper into her hand.

*

A week or so later, you’re drinking tea and comparing Supreme Court Justices past and present when she comes into the shop, and her brow furrows a bit, like she remembers you but can’t figure out from where. The ladies welcome her, and you push the tray of cookies towards her and head out the door.

In the alleyway you meet that same giant menacing man you’ve seen once before. He’s got a bouquet of flowers in one hand, the banner saying Happy Anniversary, and a brown paper bag in the other.

You nod to him, and he offers you a cupcake.

Have you ever read the Starbridge novel series by A. C. Crispin? It’s one of my favorites, and I see very few people who seem aware of it.

flamingoslim:

rikmach:

vaspider:

nehirose:

vaspider:

flamingoslim:

seananmcguire:

vaspider:

rikmach:

vaspider:

seananmcguire:

vaspider:

I haven’t! Tell me why I should read it. 😀

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH OMIGOSH.

Okay, so first of all, this series was so far ahead of its time.  Like, we say now that we want more diversity in science fiction.  Well, Starbridge had people of all different kinds–gender, race, physical ability, mental ability, and yes, species, because it’s a series about aliens that uses those aliens to say things about humanity, but not at the expense of pretending that all humans (or all aliens) must thus be One Generic Type Or We Lose The Metaphor.

There is a planet of birds whose voices are so powerful that only the Deaf can safely work with them, because otherwise they can kill you, and the books about them are explicitly anti-ableism and anti-colonialist.

There is a planet of lemurs (sort of) where they are all born a neutral gender and transform when they enter adulthood, where gender identity is treated as personal and social, while tied to biology in a very unique way.

There is a cat-person planet that will break your heart.

From an extra-universal standpoint, A.C. Crispin used the series as a way to boost a lot of other authors who might not have been as well-known, sharing a byline and thus sharing the credit, and bringing their ideas to a wide and eager audience.

So good.  So good.

….omg.

I’m gonna have to put this on my to-read list right after this book I’m trying to finish. :p I promised someone I’d finish it asap.

Heh, looks like someone else beat me to gushing about how awesome this series is.  But yes, they’re amazingly progressive, especially for when they’re written.  Female protagonists all over the place, People of Color, people of different faiths, people with disabilities, and so on.  The humans are diverse as the aliens. Heck, it was Book Three before there was a male protagonist.  

I hope you enjoy!  Strap in for a wild ride, my friend.  Jeez, imagine, someone knowing who the hell I’m talking about when I reference Dr. Blanket or Tesa.

Haha. It will likely be a while before I get to them, but I will let you know once I do!

DR. BLANKET FOREVER.

seananmcguire, thank you so much for your kind words about the StarBridge books. I was A.C. (Ann) Crispin’s co-author on two of them, Silent Dances and Silent Songs, the ones about the Deaf Interrelator. I remember Ann coming up with the Dr. Blanket character and how much fun it was to work Dr. Blanket into some of the other books. Ann was one of my dearest friends, and working on those books with her was a joy. Fortunately, they’re available as ebooks and as audiobooks again after years of being out of print. Thanks for telling others about them and sharing your joy.

How cool is this? I love the Internet sometimes.

it’s been bugging me every time i see this post go around – i couldn’t remember why, but i finally did.  a.c crispin was desperately familiar – all i could remember is that i knew the name, and knew i had loved their books, but my memory is so slapshot-crapshoot it’s a wonder that remains, some days.  anyway.  i couldn’t remember what books or why i had such positive associations with the name, but it finally came to me.

while i haven’t read any of her original works (terrible, i know) she wrote some of the books that shaped my eager, greedy-for-more little sci-fi nerd childhood.

gryphon’s eyrie and songsmith, which i found when i was nine or ten, after i’d exhausted all of my new school’s andre norton books and went looking for more.

yesterday’s son and time for yesterday, written the year before i was born and the year i turned four, which i found in the shelves of our dining room bookcase when i was nine, maybe ten.  they were some of the first star trek books i ever read, some of the first sci-fi i discovered on my own (even though they were my parents’, i think my dad’s specifically).  sarek, when i was ten, because it was a new star trek book about one of my favorite characters and being written by one of my favorite star trek authors.

the han solo trilogy, when i was twelve or thirteen, for similar reasons.

(i’m pretty sure the witch world books were borrows from the library down the street, unsure if the star wars were purchased or borrowed, but the three star treks were not only owned, but re-read so many times that i should probably buy digital copies the next time i re-read them just for the sake of keeping them intact.)

Eee! Neat!

Oh my god, Kathleen O’Malley responded to a Tumblr thread I helped start!  

EEEEEEEE!  My life is complete!

But yes, Ms. Crispin wrote a lot of excellent books in other settings before her original series, and I strongly recommend reading them.

I just love her original works, and recommend reading them more.

God, I so wish there was a Starbridge fandom.  That would be so awesome.

Dear rikmach, I am startled (in a good way) that you would have any idea who I am. Thank you so much for your kind words. Somewhere during the creation of the StarBridge series, I got swallowed by fandom and let my pro writing slide, something that exasperated Ann (A.C. Crispin) to no end (though she was always supportive). Yes, all of A.C. Crispin’s books are terrific and I am forever grateful that I had the opportunity to know her and have even a small part in their development. Ann and I became close friends when she wrote Yesterday’s Son and asked me to edit it. (There’s an acknowledgement to me in the book that refers to me as “the Red Queen.”) The experience cemented our relationship. Ann’s husband and I frequently discuss ways to promote Ann’s books to a wider audience. We, too, wish there was a StarBridge fandom. I’m open to suggestions! (Again, thank you so much for your comments. It made my day.)

hey here’s some facts about the DNC leak

esteefee:

digoxin-purpurea:

1. The DNC reported a hack of its emails by a Russian server a month ago.

2. A cybersecurity company agreed with the identification of the hacker as Russian and noted that one of the hacking groups involved was operated by the Russian military intelligence service.

In mid-June the company announced that the intruders appeared to include a group it had previously identified by the name “Cozy Bear” or “APT 29” and been inside the committee’s servers for a year. A second group, “Fancy Bear,” also called “APT 28,” came into the system in April. It appears to be operated by the G.R.U., the Russian military intelligence service, according to federal investigators and private cybersecurity firms. 

3. From the same article: Pro-Putin Russian hackers have been a thorn in the side of American cybersecurity for years now.

The first group is particularly well known to the F.B.I.’s counterintelligence unit, the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies. It was identified by federal investigators as the likely culprit behind years of intrusions into the State Department and White House unclassified computer system. 

4. Wikileaks, along with publishing the emails, published unredacted credit card numbers, passport numbers, social security numbers, and home addresses of hundreds of Democratic donors. They called this “not an error.” This is known as doxxing, and it is illegal in US jurisdictions.

Doxing is always illegal, whether it is done against a federal employee, a state employee, or a regular person.  There are federal and state laws that specifically address doxing government employees.  With regular citizens, doxing falls under various state criminal laws, such as stalking, cyberstalking, harassment, threats, and other such laws, depending on the state.  Since these doxing threats and activities are made on the internet, the law of any state may be invoked, though most often an investigator  will look to the state in which the person making the threat is located, if this is known, or the state in which the victim is situated.  A state prosecutor can only prosecute violations of the laws of his or her own state, and of acts that extend into their state.  When acts are on the internet, they extend into all the states.
Misinformation was spread that doxing is legal.  I am not sure how or why anyone fell for that misinformation.  Surely, people must understand instinctively, even if they were misled about the law, that if they are threatening someone or putting them at risk, or tormenting or harassing the other on the internet, that this must be illegal.  Common sense would tell you that bullying or jeopardizing another would be illegal in some way.  So yes, doxing is illegal, no matter who the target.

5. Wikileaks has offered support to the racist, sexist agitator and Trump supporter Milo Yiannopoulos after his ban from Twitter for inciting hate mobs. This support was not merely a tweet or two extending a hand: it was an offer to build an entire new social network fine-tuned to Yiannopoulos’ needs.

6. Milo is a vocal Trump supporter and headlined an event at the RNC.

7. Wikileaks is run by Julian Assange, an accused rapist, who has for years taken a paycheck from Russia Today, the English-language propaganda arm of the Kremlin.

8. Trump, blacklisted as he is from borrowing form most US banks, has enticed mostly investors from Russia to prop up his floundering enterprises.

After his bankruptcy and business failures roughly a decade ago Trump has had an increasingly difficult time finding sources of capital for new investments. As I noted above, Trump has been blackballed by all major US banks with the exception of Deutschebank, which is of course a foreign bank with a major US presence. He has steadied and rebuilt his financial empire with a heavy reliance on capital from Russia. At a minimum the Trump organization is receiving lots of investment capital from people close to Vladimir Putin.

9. Trump is pro-Putin to the point where he would not defend other NATO member nations against Russian attacks.

10. Trump’s right hand man, Paul Manafort, was for almost a decade an advisor to Viktor Yanukovych, the ousted president of Ukraine who now lives in exile in Russia and is a major Putin ally. Trump’s other top staffers tend towards supporting the Russian government/elite in various ways.

11. There is nothing in the DNC emails that indicates breaking of any laws.

12. Bernie Sanders only declared himself a Democrat this election cycle. The DNC was not obligated to support him, and yet they did – there are emails where staffers complain about bending over backwards for the Sanders campaign. There’s also an email from the Sanders campaign demanding a private jet  to be paid for by the DNC after Bernie had reached the point where it was mathematically impossible for him to win the nomination. (They also called Lin-Manuel Miranda a baby for not doing a fundraiser on his off day, which is frankly hilarious.)

12c. Bernie Sanders lost the Democratic nomination by 3,775,437 votes. He lost badly among registerd Democrats, black Democrats, and Latino Democrats. If the DNC is incompetent enough not to secure their servers against hackers, they are sure as shit not capable of stealing nearly four million votes.

13. Hillary Clinton does not have mind-control powers and is not responsible for every single word typed in a private DNC email server.  

14. The release of the emails was timed for when Trump would have a large amount of goodwill – the “convention bump,” as noted in several large-scale polls by reputable organizations – and before the Democrats/Hillary would have a chance to respond to the bump at their own convention.

15. Trump has engaged in much worse political ratfucking of his same-party opponents than the DNC did in its emails, in public, and it is widely known that the RNC has been attempting to sabotage him for months.

16. It ain’t like Putin hasn’t done shit like this before. He killed a journalist with plutonium. I could go on about what he does inside his country, but I’m not super familiar with it, and frankly "sitting head of state ordered the assassination of a journalist in exile by means of nuclear material" is fucked up enough. 

Conclusions that can be reasonably drawn from these facts:

1. Wikileaks, whatever its intentions in the past, is not a neutral whistleblower and cannot be, given the money their founder draws from the Russian government.

2. The DNC did not engage in any political ratfuckery beyond what is normal for any and especially this cycle, nor did they break any laws.

3. Wikileaks is not a progressive actor, given its support for both Milo Yiannopoulos and Vladimir Putin.

4. The hackers sat on the material for more than a month, and the reveal of the documents was timed to hurt Hillary Clinton and buck up Trump.

Other conclusions that can be drawn:

1. Trump and Putin colluded somehow on this hack job.

2. Putin wants Trump in the White House because Trump has, among other things, publicly stated that he will not defend NATO states bordering Russia if Russia invades, and is willing to sponsor illegal activity to make this happen.

Conclusions the FBI has drawn:

The FBI is publicly saying that they suspect the Russian government did this. Several unnamed US officials suspect this was “a deliberate attempt to influence the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump, according to five individuals familiar with the investigation of the breach.”

(Also, on that note – the DNC is not gonna accuse a foreign state of trying to influence the election via cyberterrorism without some cold hard proof. That’s not an accusation you throw around lightly, especially when you represent one of the two largest parties in America.)

TL;DR

Debbie Wasserman Schultz complaining about an independent tanking her anointed candidate should not make you mourn the death of American democracy. What should be making you furious – and terrified, honestly – is that a foreign state, led by an autocrat with a history of human rights abuses, has used a “pro-transparency” organization to achieve its goal in installing a malleable strongman and has committed cyberterrorism in the process.

Please don’t vote third party this election. Please.

this bears repeating, because it’s both terrifying and transparently evil. They have a lot of money invested in Trump, after all, and they’d like to see the payoff:
The
FBI is publicly saying that they suspect the Russian government did
this. Several unnamed US officials suspect this was “a deliberate
attempt to influence the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump,
according to five individuals familiar with the investigation of the
breach.”